//php if(!empty($last_str)){if(!preg_match('~[0-9]+~', $first_str)){echo $title;}else{echo $last_str; }}else{echo $title;}?>324: Indian Elections – Welfare Economics versus the Market
S Narayan, Head of Research and Visiting Senior Research Fellow, ISAS
9 April 2014
There appears to be considerable interest in the outcome of the ongoing elections to the Lok
Sabha (the powerful Lower House of Parliament) in India. The results are likely to be
announced by 17 May 2014, and the fierce battle between the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-
led led alliance and the Congress alliance would have concluded by that time. In the
international media, the Economist and the New York Times have come out strongly against
the candidature of Narendra Modi of the BJP for the post of Prime Minister, accusing him of
condoning the riots against Muslims in Gujarat in 2002, in his first term as Chief Minister
there. English newspapers in India, including The Hindu, are critical of him. Nongovernmental
organisations and activists, such as Arundhati Roy, have written strongly
against him. Even newspapers in Singapore have been cautious about evaluating him even while recognising the economic performance of Gujarat. The Congress and its allies continue
to harp on the secularism versus communalism theme, with Mr Rahul Gandhi of the Congress
alleging that there would be communal riots if the BJP were to come to power now. There are
also a host of regional parties, seeking to consolidate gains in their own states and hoping that
the emerging coalition government at the Centre would enable them to participate in
governance and power. As of today, the odds appear to be in favour of a strong BJP-led
government consisting of a few coalition partners, but the Indian electorate has often proved
to be unpredictable.